Wednesday, December 5. 2007Glom on WindowsTrackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
How did you manage to mention both maemo port and problems with 800x600 in the same post but be talking about two different issues?
presumably you must reduce the user interface for maemo, so why not bring that same clarity to all platforms? I'm sure I'm only pointing out the obvious when I say information such as "Small business example" is redundantly repeated in the main window and the title bar, and information such as Mode Data might be better expressed in either the status bar or the view menu and harldy needs to be front and centre at all times. If you can manage a maemo port you must already know so much you could do to refine and clarify the interface of Glom and I can only encourage you to apply the valuable lessons you already know! All criticism aside great to see you continuing to improve Glom and helping to tease Windows users with yet another great piece of Freedom Software.
You are probably right that it is possible to save some space by removing some (redundant) information. This is however not specific to the Windows port.
Also note that the problem I talked about is that the window requires too much width, and it is mostly the job of the layout developer to fix that. On the other hand, most computers run at at least 1024x768 pixels, so this shouldn't be a problem anyway. Normally you don't need to run glom in a virtual machine with a smaller resolution when you can run it on the host system as well. All I wanted to do is to make clear that the truncated window is not a bug in the Windows port.
By the way, I think vmware has a screenshot feature so you don't get the vmware window and controls in your screenshots.
|
NavigationCalendar
QuicksearchCategories |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||